view website post about availability with board meeting software reviews

Board Self-Assessment is a single of the most important leadership practices that well-performing nonprofit boards employ to ensure that they have a long-term, effective governance. It requires the board members to take a look back and honestly examine their effectiveness. This allows the board members to address problems that could otherwise result in frustration and conflict.

There are a variety of ways to conduct a self assessment of a board, from surveys and interviews to facilitated discussions. The best method will depend on the size of your board, the resources you have available and how much depth you’d like to include in the assessment.

If you decide to go with the method ensure that you define the objectives of the assessment. For instance, do you want to improve governance, align governance to organizational goals, or enhance accountability? Once you have determined this, you can select an evaluation tool.

Some tools allow you to compare your results with other hospitals or health care systems, while others are focused solely on the governance policies of your company. No matter what you choose it is crucial that the tools used are unbiased and do not call out individual directors. This will create a safe environment for honest feedback.

Many boards use a peer-review procedure, which requires directors to assess each one another. This is a beneficial and productive process, but it is important that the process remain confidential. Some directors may be reluctant to criticize a director due to fear of negative consequences. In this situation it is usually better to let the facilitator look over the responses to determine which insights are important to be shared with the board.